• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites

Home
About ITRC
Navigating this Website
Overview
Fact Sheets
Fact Sheets Overview
Fact Sheet 1: Do You Need Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 2: Are Conditions Suitable for Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 3: How is Geospatial Analysis Applied?
Fact Sheet 4: What Software is Available to Help?
PM's Tool Box
PM's Tool Box Overview
Review Checklist
Choosing Methods
Common Misapplications
Optimization Questions
Geospatial Analysis Support for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle
Data Requirements
General Considerations
Methods for Optimization
Geospatial Methods for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle Stages
Release Detection
Site Characterization
Remediation
Monitoring
Closure
Documenting Results
Fundamental Concepts
Fundamental Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Basic Data Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Interpolation Methods and Model Prediction
Uncertainty in Geospatial Analyses
Characteristics of Interpolation Methods
Work Flow
Work Flow for Conducting Geospatial Analysis
Geospatial Analysis Work Flow Overview
Perform Exploratory Data Analysis
Select Geospatial Method
Build Geospatial Model
Evaluate Geospatial Method Accuracy
Generate Geospatial Analysis Results
Using Results
Using Analysis Results for Optimization
Plume Intensity and Extent
Trend Maps
Estimating Quantities
Hot Spot Detection
Sample Spacing
Estimating Concentrations Based on Proxy Data
Background Estimation
Quantifying Uncertainty
Remedial Action Optimization
Monitoring Program Optimization
Examples
Examples Overview
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Methods
Methods Overview
Simple Geospatial Methods
More Complex Geospatial Methods
Advanced Methods
Index of Methods
Software
Software Overview
Software Comparison Tables
Software Descriptions
Workshops and Short Courses
Case Studies
Case Studies Overview
Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
PAH Contamination in Sediments—Uncertainty Analysis (Isatis)
Optimization of Long-Term Monitoring at Former Nebraska Ordnance Plant (GTS; Summit Envirosolutions)
Optimization of Lead-Contaminated Soil Remediation at a Former Lead Smelter (EVS/MVS)
Extent of Radiological Contamination in Soil at Four Sites near the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant, Japan (ArcGIS)
Optimization of Groundwater Monitoring at a Research Facility in New Jersey (GWSDAT)
Optimization of Sediment Sampling at a Tidally Influenced Site (ArcGIS)
Stringfellow Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
Lead Contamination in Soil (ArcGIS)
Stakeholder Perspectives
Additional Information
Project Life Cycle Stages
History of Remedial Process Optimization
Additional Resources
Acronyms
Glossary
Index of Methods
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback

 

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites
HOME

Splines and Kernel Smoothing

Spline and kernel smoothing methods represent a wide class of smoothing interpolation methods. One method of interpolation is to fit a polynomial surface the measured data points, where a global polynomial encompasses the entire area of interest, but may not contain sufficient detail to capture small scale variations. Local polynomials can be used to capture small scale variation, but they may not apply universally. A piecewise polynomial fitting combines adjacent local polynomial models into a patchwork model; the models can be generated using different polynomial functions but their boundaries must line up for an even joining.

Aligning boundaries is accomplished through the use of splines, which describe how the joined model behaves at the boundary between the different polynomial functions. Splines allow a smooth transition and a flexible interpolation surface. A spline is a special type of piecewise polynomial, in which the smoothness of the interpolation is controlled by a smoothing parameter. There are many different types of spline that behave similarly, including smoothing splines, regression splines, and penalized splines. The smoothing factor controls the tradeoff between fitting the data exactly and the degree of smoothness in the interpolation.

In contrast to spline smoothing, kernel smoothing is a type of moving average interpolation, in which the kernel function provides the weight that each data point receives in the average. The degree of smoothing depends on the choice of kernel function and kernel radius. Increasing the kernel radius results in a smoother interpolation as the moving average is performed over a larger area. Kernel smoothing is also called local regression.

Splines and kernel smoothers are simple to use and are readily available in many software packages. Unlike advanced spatial interpolation methods, such as kriging, splines and kernel smoothers do not require estimation of a statistical model of spatial correlation. For mapping as part of exploratory spatial data analysis, all that is needed is a list of locations and values, as well as a smoothing factor or kernel function and radius. A smoothing factor of zero will produce an interpolation spline that exactly interpolates the data. Larger smoothing factor values will smooth the spline to a greater degree. Similarly, the kernel radius controls the smoothness of the kernel smoother. These smoothing parameters can be chosen manually based on a visual appraisal of the resulting maps or through cross-validation.

Typical Applications

▼Read more


In addition to mapping, splines and kernel smoothers can also be used to help detect outliers, if the value at a known sampling point is significantly different from the value of the interpolated value at that point.
Strengths and Weaknesses

▼Read more


Using splines and kernel methods to visualize general trends in data can be extremely useful as an extension of exploratory spatial data analysis. These methods do not require the estimation of a statistical model of spatial correlation, and can therefore be used early in the data analysis before more complex and computationally intensive methods, such as kriging, are used. Smoothing methods can help in the development of a CSM, capture general trends in data, and detect outlying data points. Another major strength is the flexibility to incorporate break lines and barriers into the interpolation.

Smoothing methods, however, should not be regarded as a replacement for more formal statistical methods. In particular, the manual choice of smoothing parameter leads to some subjectivity in the resulting maps. Although the maps resulting from splines and kernel methods may be similar to those from advanced methods such as kriging, in general smoothing methods do not provide uncertainty estimates.

Understanding the Results

▼Read more


In the context of optimization, see how to use the results of the geospatial methods to address specific optimization questions.


GRO

web document
glossaryGRO Glossary
referencesGRO References
acronymsGRO Acronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.