• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites

Navigating this Website
Overview
Fact Sheets
Fact Sheets Overview
Fact Sheet 1: Do You Need Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 2: Are Conditions Suitable for Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 3: How is Geospatial Analysis Applied?
Fact Sheet 4: What Software is Available to Help?
PM's Tool Box
PM's Tool Box Overview
Review Checklist
Choosing Methods
Common Misapplications
Optimization Questions
Geospatial Analysis Support for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle
Data Requirements
General Considerations
Methods for Optimization
Geospatial Methods for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle Stages
Release Detection
Site Characterization
Remediation
Monitoring
Closure
Documenting Results
Fundamental Concepts
Fundamental Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Basic Data Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Interpolation Methods and Model Prediction
Uncertainty in Geospatial Analyses
Characteristics of Interpolation Methods
Work Flow
Work Flow for Conducting Geospatial Analysis
Geospatial Analysis Work Flow Overview
Perform Exploratory Data Analysis
Select Geospatial Method
Build Geospatial Model
Evaluate Geospatial Method Accuracy
Generate Geospatial Analysis Results
Using Results
Using Analysis Results for Optimization
Plume Intensity and Extent
Trend Maps
Estimating Quantities
Hot Spot Detection
Sample Spacing
Estimating Concentrations Based on Proxy Data
Background Estimation
Quantifying Uncertainty
Remedial Action Optimization
Monitoring Program Optimization
Examples
Examples Overview
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Methods
Methods Overview
Simple Geospatial Methods
More Complex Geospatial Methods
Advanced Methods
Index of Methods
Software
Software Overview
Software Comparison Tables
Software Descriptions
Workshops and Short Courses
Case Studies
Case Studies Overview
Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
PAH Contamination in Sediments—Uncertainty Analysis (Isatis)
Optimization of Long-Term Monitoring at Former Nebraska Ordnance Plant (GTS; Summit Envirosolutions)
Optimization of Lead-Contaminated Soil Remediation at a Former Lead Smelter (EVS/MVS)
Extent of Radiological Contamination in Soil at Four Sites near the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant, Japan (ArcGIS)
Optimization of Groundwater Monitoring at a Research Facility in New Jersey (GWSDAT)
Optimization of Sediment Sampling at a Tidally Influenced Site (ArcGIS)
Stringfellow Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
Lead Contamination in Soil (ArcGIS)
Stakeholder Perspectives
Additional Information
Project Life Cycle Stages
History of Remedial Process Optimization
Additional Resources
Acronyms
Glossary
Index of Methods
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback

 

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites
HOME

Monitoring Program Optimization

Geospatial methods can be used to optimize monitoring programs by identifying redundancies or gaps in monitoring well coverage, highlighting areas with higher contaminant concentrations for more aggressive remedial action, and determining the sampling schedule that most effectively balances data collection with budget constraints.

Understanding the Results: ▼Read more

Spatial optimization of long-term groundwater monitoring networks generally consists of evaluating how interpolation error increases when removing wells from the sampling program. Two commonly used software packages in the public domain that perform this spatial optimization are MAROS and VSP (see the MAROS case studies and VSP example). MAROS uses simple geospatial methods (Voronoi/Delaunay mesh, natural neighbor) to interpolate the data and evaluate the effects of data point removal, while VSP uses kriging to interpolate the data and evaluate the effects of data point removal. These iterative data point removal operations can also be performed manually using simple or advanced geospatial methods in an alternative contouring program.

An alternative approach is to evaluate prediction uncertainty using advanced methods, such as conditional simulation, to provide the basis for recommending additional monitoring locations or removing existing monitoring locations. Temporal optimization of long-term groundwater monitoring networks typically involves single-well variography to evaluate the range of temporal correlation at each well. This application is illustrated in the VSP example at the end of this section.

The results of spatial long-term monitoring optimization analysis as performed in MAROS and VSP provide a ranking of the relative importance of each well in terms of its impact on the interpolation, as well as quantification of the cumulative impact of removing less-important wells on the overall interpolation. This approach is similar to cross-validation. Analysis of the kriging variance and more robust uncertainty analysis using conditional simulation illustrate where prediction uncertainty is highest and lowest. Using professional judgment, appropriate threshold error or uncertainty metrics can then be applied to decide whether to remove or add monitoring locations. Programs such as MAROS recommend locations for removal based on default threshold values; however, these values can be changed based on professional judgment. It is often easier to conceptualize confidence limits on predictions for use in monitoring program assessment, which are only obtained from uncertainty analysis using advanced methods.

For temporal optimization, the range at which samples are no longer temporally correlated is often used as the basis for selecting the appropriate minimum time interval between independent sampling events. If the range of temporal correlation is greater than the current sampling frequency (for example, 180 days for semiannual frequency), it would be defensible to reduce the monitoring frequency and increase the time between sampling events.

image_pdfPrint this page/section



GRO

web document
glossaryGRO Glossary
referencesGRO References
acronymsGRO Acronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.