• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites

Home
About ITRC
Navigating this Website
Overview
Fact Sheets
Fact Sheets Overview
Fact Sheet 1: Do You Need Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 2: Are Conditions Suitable for Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 3: How is Geospatial Analysis Applied?
Fact Sheet 4: What Software is Available to Help?
PM's Tool Box
PM's Tool Box Overview
Review Checklist
Choosing Methods
Common Misapplications
Optimization Questions
Geospatial Analysis Support for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle
Data Requirements
General Considerations
Methods for Optimization
Geospatial Methods for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle Stages
Release Detection
Site Characterization
Remediation
Monitoring
Closure
Documenting Results
Fundamental Concepts
Fundamental Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Basic Data Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Interpolation Methods and Model Prediction
Uncertainty in Geospatial Analyses
Characteristics of Interpolation Methods
Work Flow
Work Flow for Conducting Geospatial Analysis
Geospatial Analysis Work Flow Overview
Perform Exploratory Data Analysis
Select Geospatial Method
Build Geospatial Model
Evaluate Geospatial Method Accuracy
Generate Geospatial Analysis Results
Using Results
Using Analysis Results for Optimization
Plume Intensity and Extent
Trend Maps
Estimating Quantities
Hot Spot Detection
Sample Spacing
Estimating Concentrations Based on Proxy Data
Background Estimation
Quantifying Uncertainty
Remedial Action Optimization
Monitoring Program Optimization
Examples
Examples Overview
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Methods
Methods Overview
Simple Geospatial Methods
More Complex Geospatial Methods
Advanced Methods
Index of Methods
Software
Software Overview
Software Comparison Tables
Software Descriptions
Workshops and Short Courses
Case Studies
Case Studies Overview
Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
PAH Contamination in Sediments—Uncertainty Analysis (Isatis)
Optimization of Long-Term Monitoring at Former Nebraska Ordnance Plant (GTS; Summit Envirosolutions)
Optimization of Lead-Contaminated Soil Remediation at a Former Lead Smelter (EVS/MVS)
Extent of Radiological Contamination in Soil at Four Sites near the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant, Japan (ArcGIS)
Optimization of Groundwater Monitoring at a Research Facility in New Jersey (GWSDAT)
Optimization of Sediment Sampling at a Tidally Influenced Site (ArcGIS)
Stringfellow Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
Lead Contamination in Soil (ArcGIS)
Stakeholder Perspectives
Additional Information
Project Life Cycle Stages
History of Remedial Process Optimization
Additional Resources
Acronyms
Glossary
Index of Methods
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback

 

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites
HOME

Example 4

Example 4: Sampling Design Strategy
Application: Sampling Design Strategy
Source: Example courtesy of James R. Henderson, TruGround Environmental. [email protected]
Application Summary: A geostatistical/variogram analysis was employed to assist in the identification of data gaps, and in turn, development of optimal future sampling strategies to address data gaps.
Software: Visual Site Plan (VSP), ArcGIS/Geostatistical Analyst or other software capable of spatial interpolation and variography.
Methods: Geostatistical semivariogram analysis.
Data Requirements: See recommendations regarding data requirements for variography, typically a minimum of 30 samples.
References: ASTM 2010a; Deutsch and Journel 1992; Englund and Sparks 1988; Isaaks and Srivastava 1989; USEPA 1996; Woolfenden and Koczot 2001.
Approach: As part of a data needs assessment, a review of existing surficial (0-2 ft) soils was completed to assess compliance with regulatory risk based criteria. A geostatistical analysis was used to identify data gaps, and then develop optimal future sampling strategies to address data gaps. The scope of this geostatistical analysis included the following steps:
  1. Perform exploratory GIS review of existing soil data to assess general coverage.
  2. Perform variography on existing data to determine the range of correlation COCs.
  3. Use the range of correlation values as a guide for sample spacing design in data gap areas.
Results:
Step 1: Figure 57/Step1 provides an illustration of a GIS based exploratory analysis which visually identifies obvious data gap areas. In this case, two areas are noted as lacking soil copper data, which will require collection of data at a certain count and distribution to be filled.
Step 2: Under the assumption that the copper impact patterns observed at areas near these data gaps are reasonably expected to be similar, variography was used to determine sample size and spacing. Using the surficial soil copper data, a variogram (Figure 57/Step 2) was generated and the resulting range of correlation was calculated to be 100 ft. This result means that the soil copper data are correlated in such a way that concentrations can be interpolated (for example, kriged) between samples that are no greater than 100 ft apart. Thus, any identified areas that have samples at a distance greater than 100-ft would require further sampling to eliminated this data gap.
Step 3: With the variography completed, a sampling design scheme was developed to address the previously described data gaps based upon a range correlation value of 100-ft. Thus a systematic grid with separation distances no greater than 100 ft was used a design guideline for future sampling, (Figure 57/Step 3). The variography should always be repeated after sampling to ensure that the original 100-ft range was adequate.

example_4_fig1

Step 1

example_4_fig2_trimmed

Step 2

example_4_fig3

Step 3

Figure 57. Illustration of the steps in the sampling design strategy.
Source: Image courtesy of USGS Earthstar Geographics SIO© 2016 Microsoft Corporation© 2010 NAVTEQ© (applies to Figure 57, Step 1 and Step 3).

image_pdfPrint this page/section



GRO

web document
glossaryGRO Glossary
referencesGRO References
acronymsGRO Acronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.