• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites

Navigating this Website
Overview
Fact Sheets
Fact Sheets Overview
Fact Sheet 1: Do You Need Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 2: Are Conditions Suitable for Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 3: How is Geospatial Analysis Applied?
Fact Sheet 4: What Software is Available to Help?
PM's Tool Box
PM's Tool Box Overview
Review Checklist
Choosing Methods
Common Misapplications
Optimization Questions
Geospatial Analysis Support for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle
Data Requirements
General Considerations
Methods for Optimization
Geospatial Methods for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle Stages
Release Detection
Site Characterization
Remediation
Monitoring
Closure
Documenting Results
Fundamental Concepts
Fundamental Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Basic Data Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Interpolation Methods and Model Prediction
Uncertainty in Geospatial Analyses
Characteristics of Interpolation Methods
Work Flow
Work Flow for Conducting Geospatial Analysis
Geospatial Analysis Work Flow Overview
Perform Exploratory Data Analysis
Select Geospatial Method
Build Geospatial Model
Evaluate Geospatial Method Accuracy
Generate Geospatial Analysis Results
Using Results
Using Analysis Results for Optimization
Plume Intensity and Extent
Trend Maps
Estimating Quantities
Hot Spot Detection
Sample Spacing
Estimating Concentrations Based on Proxy Data
Background Estimation
Quantifying Uncertainty
Remedial Action Optimization
Monitoring Program Optimization
Examples
Examples Overview
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Methods
Methods Overview
Simple Geospatial Methods
More Complex Geospatial Methods
Advanced Methods
Index of Methods
Software
Software Overview
Software Comparison Tables
Software Descriptions
Workshops and Short Courses
Case Studies
Case Studies Overview
Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
PAH Contamination in Sediments—Uncertainty Analysis (Isatis)
Optimization of Long-Term Monitoring at Former Nebraska Ordnance Plant (GTS; Summit Envirosolutions)
Optimization of Lead-Contaminated Soil Remediation at a Former Lead Smelter (EVS/MVS)
Extent of Radiological Contamination in Soil at Four Sites near the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant, Japan (ArcGIS)
Optimization of Groundwater Monitoring at a Research Facility in New Jersey (GWSDAT)
Optimization of Sediment Sampling at a Tidally Influenced Site (ArcGIS)
Stringfellow Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
Lead Contamination in Soil (ArcGIS)
Stakeholder Perspectives
Additional Information
Project Life Cycle Stages
History of Remedial Process Optimization
Additional Resources
Acronyms
Glossary
Index of Methods
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback

 

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites
HOME

Review Checklist

The purpose of this checklist is to address common questions about geospatial analysis. This checklist can be used to explain the use of geospatial analysis at an environmental site. The checklist could be completed by the preparer of a geospatial analysis or used by a reviewer to document the information contained in a report about any project life cycle stage. The information identified in the checklist could be attached to a printout of the checklist, or the checklist could be included in a site report. Each site will vary depending on the objectives and purpose of the application of the geospatial analysis covering different complexities, methods, model validation, and uncertainty analysis. The checklist refers to portions of the ITRC document Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites (GRO-1).

Click Here to download a printable Review Checklist in Adobe Acrobat format.

▢ Which portion of the life cycle is addressed? (see the Project Life Cycle Stages section)

  • Release detection
  • Site characterization
  • Remediation
  • Monitoring
  • Closure

▢ Which questions are answered (see Figures 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7)?

▢ Was a simple, more complex, or advanced method chosen (see Table 3. Organizing Geospatial Interpolation Methods)?

  • Simple
  • More complex
  • Advanced

▢ Which geospatial method(s) were used?

  • Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the method relative to the data set (see the Methods and Index of Methods sections).
  • Describe the assumptions used for the geospatial method selected.
  • Provide the number of data points (number of samples/locations (x,y,z)/time/frequency); see Table 1 for a summary of minimum requirements of data sets for geospatial analysis.
  • Provide the time range of the entire data set and the time range of the data used in the geospatial analysis.
  • Describe the sample design (see the Spatial Correlation section) and spacing/density, including how the number of data points and sample spacing/density was determined.
  • Was the number determined using variography (see the Variogram section)?
  • Are the sample size and distribution adequate for the geospatial method selected? Describe as relevant to the assumptions of the model.
  • Describe spatial relationships and autocorrelation results (see the Basic Data Concepts for Geospatial Analysis section). Describe the quantification of autocorrelation for advanced methods, if applicable.

▢ Was stationarity determined for the data?

  • If yes, which type of stationarity was used in the analyses? (See the Stationarity section)
    • Strict
    • Second order
    • Intrinsic
    • Nonstationary

▢ Describe any data point(s) excluded from the analyses and the reason(s) for excluding these data.

▢ Were multiple methods used and compared for the same goal? How do the conclusions agree and how do they differ (see the Exact versus Inexact Interpolation section)?

▢ Provide the various methods used in the analysis to support the conclusions.

▢ Review the CSM and project goals.

▢ Describe the exploratory data analyses performed (see the Perform Exploratory Data Analysis section).

▢ Describe how the appropriate geospatial model was selected. (see the Select Geospatial Model section).

▢ Describe the development of the geospatial model (see the Build Geospatial Model section).

▢ Describe the model validation and uncertainty analyses (see the Evaluate Geospatial Method Accuracy section).

▢ Describe the spatial predictions or realizations (see the Generate Geospatial Analysis Results section).

▢ Describe how the empirical data support or confirm the prediction(s) (see  the Using Analysis Results for Optimization section).

▢ What method was used to assess model goodness-of-fit (see the Evaluate Geospatial Method Accuracy section)? List or describe the resulting action.

▢ Provide examples or case studies where similar analyses were carried out under similar situations (see the Case Studies section), if applicable.

▢ Provide the name or details of the software used in the analysis and other alternatives that can be used (see the Software section).

pdf  Print this page



GRO

web document
glossaryGRO Glossary
referencesGRO References
acronymsGRO Acronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.