• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites

Home
About ITRC
Navigating this Website
Overview
Fact Sheets
Fact Sheets Overview
Fact Sheet 1: Do You Need Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 2: Are Conditions Suitable for Geospatial Analysis?
Fact Sheet 3: How is Geospatial Analysis Applied?
Fact Sheet 4: What Software is Available to Help?
PM's Tool Box
PM's Tool Box Overview
Review Checklist
Choosing Methods
Common Misapplications
Optimization Questions
Geospatial Analysis Support for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle
Data Requirements
General Considerations
Methods for Optimization
Geospatial Methods for Optimization Questions in the Project Life Cycle Stages
Release Detection
Site Characterization
Remediation
Monitoring
Closure
Documenting Results
Fundamental Concepts
Fundamental Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Basic Data Concepts for Geospatial Analysis
Interpolation Methods and Model Prediction
Uncertainty in Geospatial Analyses
Characteristics of Interpolation Methods
Work Flow
Work Flow for Conducting Geospatial Analysis
Geospatial Analysis Work Flow Overview
Perform Exploratory Data Analysis
Select Geospatial Method
Build Geospatial Model
Evaluate Geospatial Method Accuracy
Generate Geospatial Analysis Results
Using Results
Using Analysis Results for Optimization
Plume Intensity and Extent
Trend Maps
Estimating Quantities
Hot Spot Detection
Sample Spacing
Estimating Concentrations Based on Proxy Data
Background Estimation
Quantifying Uncertainty
Remedial Action Optimization
Monitoring Program Optimization
Examples
Examples Overview
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Methods
Methods Overview
Simple Geospatial Methods
More Complex Geospatial Methods
Advanced Methods
Index of Methods
Software
Software Overview
Software Comparison Tables
Software Descriptions
Workshops and Short Courses
Case Studies
Case Studies Overview
Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
PAH Contamination in Sediments—Uncertainty Analysis (Isatis)
Optimization of Long-Term Monitoring at Former Nebraska Ordnance Plant (GTS; Summit Envirosolutions)
Optimization of Lead-Contaminated Soil Remediation at a Former Lead Smelter (EVS/MVS)
Extent of Radiological Contamination in Soil at Four Sites near the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant, Japan (ArcGIS)
Optimization of Groundwater Monitoring at a Research Facility in New Jersey (GWSDAT)
Optimization of Sediment Sampling at a Tidally Influenced Site (ArcGIS)
Stringfellow Superfund Site Monitoring Optimization (MAROS)
Lead Contamination in Soil (ArcGIS)
Stakeholder Perspectives
Additional Information
Project Life Cycle Stages
History of Remedial Process Optimization
Additional Resources
Acronyms
Glossary
Index of Methods
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback

 

Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites
HOME

Software Overview

Geospatial methods can be computationally intense, consequently, advances in computation power have led to wider application of these methods. Several new software applications can perform geospatial functions, and many existing software products have added geospatial features. Although geospatial methods may be unfamiliar to some, many people have already unknowingly used these methods. For example, some software packages that produce contour maps use kriging as the default method. Unless users specifically change the interpolation method, they may be unaware that the software uses kriging to generate contours, grid maps, or other types of surface maps.

This software overview is provided for project managers and does not replace a thorough review of the appropriateness of any software package. Prior to using a software package, verify its applicability and accuracy. Also, make sure that the assumptions and input requirements are understood for any geospatial methods used in making decisions. Note that not all of the software packages are specifically designed for geospatial analyses of environmental data or specifically for optimization. Some are general software packages intended for use in different business or scientific application areas. Consult with the software developer to ensure that the most current available version of the application is being considered prior to use.

ITRC, ERIS, and ECOS do not endorse or recommend specific technology, software, or providers, but rather provide information to help make better environmental decisions (see About ITRC for further discussion of this policy). Inclusion of a software in this guidance is not an ITRC endorsement of the software, and omission of a software package is not ITRC disapproval of that software. ITRC compiled this list based on the team’s collective experience with the software. The list of software presented here is not comprehensive and does not imply preferences over other software.

As geospatial methods become more common in many scientific fields, software products capable of geospatial analyses will continue to be developed. Be aware that many organizations and companies restrict the installation of software on their computers, particularly those that require administration rights, and it may be difficult or impossible to install certain programs in some organizations.

The following attributes are provided in the description of each software package:

  • General Description
  • Source
  • Ease of Use
  • References
  • Training and Resources

Table 6 summarizes the software packages described in this guidance.

Table 6. Summary of software

Software Ease of Use Cost
ArcGIS Moderate $$
EVS/MVS Complex $$$
Global Mapper Moderate $
GMS Moderate $$-$$$
GRASS Complex Free
GS+ Moderate $
GTS Moderate Free
GWSDAT Easy Free
HydroGeoAnalyst Moderate $$$
Isatis Complex $$$
Kartotrak Moderate $$$
Leapfrog Hydro Moderate $$$
MAROS Easy Free
R (geoR,geoRgim) Complex Free
RockWorks Moderate $-$$
SADA Moderate Free
SAS Complex $$$
SGeMS Complex Free
Summit Envirosolutions Moderate $
Surfer Easy $
Voxler Easy $
VSP Easy Free
Note
This list is based on the collective experience of the ITRC team with the specific software shown. This list does not include all software available. The omission of a software package should not be interpreted as disapproval of that software.

Key
$ = < $1,000
$$ = $1,000 – $5,000
$$$ = > $5,000

Ease of Use
Easy – A new user can learn this software with minimal training. The software has an intuitive graphical user interface (GUI) and data input/output interfaces easily with common file formats. Functionality of the software may be somewhat limited.
Moderate – This software is accessible enough for a new user to learn with some introductory training from tutorials or short courses but powerful enough to feature advanced capabilities for the expert user.
Complex – Considerable user skill and training are required to use this software. The software may not have a GUI and programming may be required to build or run a model.

image_pdfPrint this page/section



GRO

web document
glossaryGRO Glossary
referencesGRO References
acronymsGRO Acronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.